courses
|
forum
|
electives
|
life beyond artsci
|
theses
username password  You are not logged in. | help
Tuesday 07 September 2010
You must be logged in to post.

Academics: Comments, Questions, Suggestions for the Artsci Curriculum



Nida S.05/09/2010 02:01:37
Anyone have poli sci 3LL3 Public policy and development textbook? :)


Jordan M.03/09/2010 13:29:23
Buying Bio2F03 (Ecology) Textbook. Info in chat.


Stephanie K.31/08/2010 18:48:36
I am looking for someone to help me in Orgo (chem 2OA3) in first term. If interested, let me know.


Will v. E.20/08/2010 11:20:50
If anyone is interested in taking Indian Religious Traditions (Artsci 3L03) with Dr. Pearson, I've got the course pack from last year and Religions of South Asia. Send me an email.


Michael C.13/08/2010 21:56:03
Anyone of bio 2ee3 textbooks?


Julia B.13/06/2010 12:10:22
Who has taken History 2EE3 - Science and technology in world history, who can tell me more about it... i read the review someone wrote, but i was deciding between this one and Relig st 2HH3

ALSO has anyone taken relig st 2ZZ3 - Shakespeare relig and political themes?
thanks :)


Farhana D.05/06/2010 00:56:33
Does anyone know the difference between Artsci 3CG3 and Artsci 3CF3 (the 2 science inquiries...)? Recommend one over the other? thanks :)


Noah C.28/05/2010 09:47:29
Has anyone taken both Geog 1HA3 or Geog 1HB3 and can someone tell me the difference between the two.


Alex Y.27/05/2010 10:33:05
That is the legal inquiry course indeed. According to Diane's email:
'Arts & Science 3CR3 Topics Inquiry - Legal for 2010-11'


Meagan M.13/05/2010 14:28:46
Question about the new legal inquiry course for next year:

Do we think it's "Inquiry: Special Topics" within the Artsci section on the Master Course Timetable? It says Topic TBA...


Adira W.10/05/2010 10:32:46
People combining is Psych
Do you recommend 2F03 (Neuroscience with Goldriech) or 2N03 (Principles of Neuropsychology with Ullal)?


Shawn F.22/04/2010 16:34:09
Regarding BIO 2A03

There has been too much bashing of this course. Let it be known that I took this class in winter 2009 and thoroughly enjoyed it (although i went to a total of 4 lectures and had a post-grad TA who just gave us As).


Marushka R.19/04/2010 12:41:44
Any kind souls care to explain A3 and A5 on the 2008/2009 exam?


Carla B.18/04/2010 23:13:54
Hannah, I like your A8. That totally makes sense!

As for A2)
w=k/m
And you can find k because you know the equilibrium position of the spring. When the spring is at equilibrium,
mg=ks

If you don't understand that, ask me tomorrow and I can show you in person.


Beka P.18/04/2010 22:43:11
sorry i'm tots stuck on A2a) for 08/09...how did you guys get omega (w)??


Hannah M.18/04/2010 22:00:32
As much as It pains me I have to agree with Daniel for 9. Only part a though. I got 2.44e19 for b.


Hannah M.18/04/2010 21:27:30
8. Ok I did something different again. This time I think I'm right. I got a range for v which I used to get a range for delta p. Then I found the delta x range. Cause the whole point is that we know the velocity range but not the position. I got (3.3133e-35, 3.3127e-35 for the bullet and (7.282e-7,7.281e-7) for the electron. The actual numbers may be off cause I make mistakes a lot but that's what I did. Also I realize the intervals are backwards. I'm a rebel.


Hannah M.18/04/2010 21:01:33
Ok I haven't done most of tehm but so far I agree with everything except 6.
I made a very different assumption thinking that it was excited to n=4. This would allow it to emit 6 differen wavelengths going from 4-3,4-2,4-1,3-2,3-1,2-1. Then I used the same formula. I figured that since that they may not hve necessarily gone to the ground state right away.... Not 100% confident though.


Carla B.18/04/2010 20:25:39
Whoops, Daniel, you're right about A9. I used mass of the earth instead of the sun.

As for the rest:
2b) If the spring is extended by 0.1m, that means it is 0.14m from the start of the oscillation or 0.06m from the highest point. So, I used 0.06 as my x, and solved for t, then plugged that into the velocity equation.

6) I made that same assumption, but I calculated the energy change to promote and electron from n=1 to n=7. Then I subbed that into E=hc/lambda.

8) Isn't the equation delta p delta x > h(bar)/2? Also, I don't know why you did the 1% range thing. It might be right, I just have no idea why you would do it.


Daniel C.N.18/04/2010 19:58:10
Upon closer inspection I am wear loafers.

Thanks Carla.

2b) can you go over how you got this, i get .75 m/s but i'm not that happy with it.

5) carla is correct, calculation error on my part.
6) my revised, but likely inaccurate solution is 9.3e-8. I simple assumed that the beam had excited hydrogen to its 7th energy level, thus allowing it to emmit 7 different spectrums as it jumped down each energy level. then used the 1/lambda = R (1/n^2 - 1/m^2) to find the wavelength of the light.

8) so i used delta p x delta x > h. we know both m and v, so can solve for selta p (i think). and then calculate x, i simple added and subtracted 0.01 of my answer for x to get a range, probably not right, but thats whati got.

9) i kinda stand by my answers. i used Rs=2GM/c^2, to find r, what did you do.

© 2002-2010 Society of Arts & Science StudentsTopContact | Credits | e.oneohfive ver. 1.5 (in pumpkin)